Exploring Latin Jazz: Analysis & Questions about Nuevo Tango
The Exploring series allows you to travel with me as I explore various sides of Latin Jazz that are still fairly new to me. I’ve studied and performed Cuban-based Latin Jazz quite a bit, and to a lesser degree, I’ve been involved with Brazilian influenced Latin Jazz. Today’s modern Latin Jazz world encompasses much more than the music of Cuba and Brazil though, and I feel a bit behind the times. I encourage you to join me as I broaden my horizons and learn more about a variety of Latin Jazz styles.
In the last Exploring post, I looked at what makes Peruvian Jazz unique; today I’m analyzing and questioning tango. I’m stepping back from the application of Tango in jazz; instead I decided that I needed a clear understanding of the basics. I’m having trouble describing the elements that constitute Tango, so my search begins here. I can’t loose jazz altogether though, so my research revolves around immersive listening of Nuevo Tango. Argentina’s great composer Astor Piazzolla developed this modern approach and fortunately, he left a great legacy of recordings to study. Piazzolla integrated jazz extensively into his music, so the two styles remain intertwined. My analysis and questions today stem from Piazzolla’s work.
I’ve detailed three areas where I looked further into nuevo tango, as well as the resultant questions from my study:
AREA #1: The Clear Implication of a Rhythmic Structure Without Repeating Patterns
I’m accostumed to a very distinct rhythmic approach in Latin Jazz - Cuban rhythmic styles are held together by clave and every involved instrument builds its pattern upon that figure. After learning the style, the clave is easy to recognize because the rhythmic patterns of each style remain consistent between songs. Regardless of the composition or arrangement, a Cha Cha Cha rhythm has a distinct pattern that stands apart from a Rumba Guaguanco. Although you may miss the subtleties of the style, you can find a book with accurate notation and learn the different Cuban rhythms. There is a consistency to each style that makes it familiar, danceable, and instantly recognizable.
To my ears, Nuevo Tango does not have a series of textbook patterns, but it holds a distinct rhythmic feel. I recognize a certain feel that runs through a different songs, but I have yet to transcribe a specific pattern that defines tango. I’ve experienced several tango recordings that lack percussion altogether; the recordings that include drummers lack consistent percussion instrumentation. In many ways, tango avoids being pegged as a rhythmic style; instead it relies on a variety of elements to create it’s unique sound. A distinct harmonic approach, specific sonic elements, and compositional strategies all play equal parts to the music’s rhythm.
At This Point, I Ask These Questions:
Should Tango be considered a rhythmic style?
Is there a consistent underlying rhythmic structure in Tango?
AREA #2: The Massive Presence of Bandoneon
Listeners associate one sound with Nuevo Tango more than any other - the Argentinean bandoneon. An instrument similar to the accordion, the bandoneon creates a much richer tone and displays a wider emotional range. It is a free-reed instrument that utilizes a bellows to control air; the instrumentalist plays the bandoneon on the lap. Instead of a traditional piano-like keyboard, the bandoneon has a series of keys on both sides of the instrument. When the bellows bring air in, the keys produce a different note than when the instrument exhales air. Most instruments contain 71 keys, which can either be played in combination or individually. The layout of the keys make chord production relatively basic, but the execution of rapid melodic lines becomes increasingly difficult.
While the bandoneon clearly resides as the primary instrument in Nuevo Tango, it’s specific role remains unclear to me. I’ve heard the bandoneon playing chordal parts in rhythmic patterns, much like a piano player in a Cuban Jazz setting. At the same time, bandoneon players take melodic roles, much like a saxophone player or a string section. Bandoneon players take solos and skilled players can improvise fast, furious, and passionate lines. In each case, other instruments that covered these same roles shared the song with the bandoneon; it engaged each instrument in a call and response. Listening closely, the bandoneon could almost disappear and the musical roles would be covered; yet, the music would ultimately sound drastically different.
These Questions Arise Around the Bandoneon:
How could we describe the specific function of the bandoneon in Nuevo Tango?
Lacking a bandoneon player, what instrument would be the most appropriate substitute?
AREA #3: Greater Emphasis Upon Composition and Form
Nuevo Tango exists as a composed form, leaning more towards the highly structured ideas of Western European art music than the freedom of jazz. While a jazz standard may be a 32 measure series of chords repeated for improvisation, a Nuevo Tango composition involves longer structures. In many cases, these structures are repeated, but the greater number of measures guarantees variety. Each section contains specific written lines with intertwining melodies; the precise nature of this composition technique discourages embellishment. Many sections often feature an instrument playing a melodic line over a composed background part; in this context, the soloist has freedom to interpret within the composition. Nuevo Tango composers also employ “classical” composition techniques such as tempo changes, a greater range of dynamic shadings, and highly defined articulations. Overall, the composition runs the performance.
Although composition reigns supreme in Nuevo Tango, the music also contains ample room for jazz style improvisation. While these sections don’t resemble the open solo cycles of jazz, they do provide consistent foundations for improvisation. I’ve encountered examples of these improvisation “spots” utilizing different chord changes than the previous composition; at times, they move over a one-chord vamp. Whatever the harmonic foundation, Nuevo Tango composers consistently create a unique texture that spotlights the soloist’s distinct sound. From seemingly rubato chord patches to the relentless rhythmic drive of bowed strings, each solo section stands apart from the rest of the song and brings the soloist’s strengths to the forefront.
My Questions About Nuevo Tango Composition:
Jazz has 12 bar blues, rhythm changes, and more - does Nuevo Tango utilize standard forms?
How much does a composer consider the individual serving as soloist when writing sections for improvisation?
———-
HELP ME EXPLORE FURTHER!
I’ve had some great response to my exploration of Afro-Peruvian music and all of your input has been incredibly helpful. I know that the tango experts are out there - chime in and help us out here. Can you answer these questions or at least guide me in the right direction? Maybe you’ve got some questions of your own? LEAVE A COMMENT and guide us to more information - I think that we’d all like to know more!



Saxophone Player Mitch Frohman
listen to the work of Astor Piazzolla. Study his compositions and arrangements. That is what I have done.. There are also some other good works for tango written by Albeniz for tango. There is a wealth these days of tango artitst on the web, but the shadow of Piazzolla is a heavy one. Tango has form but it is not standard AABA bullshit (as you can tell I think the AABA song form needs to be buried).
Thomas - thanks so much for the info here. Piazzolla was a huge voice in the music; I sometimes find it difficult to distinguish between his influence and new original voices. I think that you’re right, I need to dive into an in-depth musical study. If have ideas about - “must-have” Piazzolla albums, transcriptions of his music, or any books about him, please pass them onto me! I’ll check out Albeniz as well, thanks for the recommendation - that’s a new one to me. I’d also love any specific info you have about form in tango. Thanks for the info - it inspires me to dig deeper!
Chip
You may find that to answer your questions you need to dig deep into Piazzolla’s roots in tango, understand what and how he changed things, and then maybe draw some conclusions. So first a couple of 1910’s recordings (Pacho Maglio, Vicente Greco), then the first innovators (Fresedo, De Caro) in the 1920’s, the 1930’s dance style (D’Arienzo) into the great orchestras of the 40’s (where Piazzolla got started): Troilo, Pugliese, Gobbi, and the dance orchestras (Biaggi, Calo, D’agostino). Piazzolla’s first orchestra recordings from 1946-47. Keep your eye (ear!) out for the evolution of tango singing, from Gardel (1920’s top 1935) to the orchestra singers (all of the dance orchestras had singers). That gets you to the more complex arrangements of the 1950’s, with Troilo and Pugliese still active, Salgan, Francini-Pontier, and at the end of that decade, AP’s first revolution, his Octet. In the sixties it was all about shows and recordings, continuing the discography of Troilo and Pugliese, more Salgan, and the first small groups: Sesxteto Tango, Quinteto Real, and AP’s quintets (the first ones, not the ones with Ziegler). The 70’s are a wasteland, except for AP (his electric and European period, but starting with his brilliant Nonet) and perhaps Sexteto Mayor (which was to become the core of Tango Argentino on Broadway). A lot of the good and experimental seventies recordings are very hard to find.
In the 80’s is all Piazzolla, through his American recordings.
Make sure as you listen that you are understanding thsi chrtonilogy, IOW, Troilo of the 40’s is different from 50’s and from 60’s, so listen with discographic info on hand to understand the changes that happened roughly every 12 years.
I think among many other things you will find a handful of recurring rhythmic patterns, that vary according to the style of each orchestra and its arangers, but musically remain identifiable (the marcato in 4, the sincopa and the milonga). Piazzolla, perhaps under the influence of bossa nova and jazz, starts to create his own steady 4/4 rhythmic patterns (with the walking bass that he picked up from 40’s Troilo pianists) and for a time his copmositions are more formally clear thatn standard tango arrangements. When you hear stuff from the 50’s on, the level of “arrangement” in each chart is very high, with stuff changing every 4 bars or less, change in rhythm, change in orchestration, change in tempo, phrasing and rhythmic variations of the original melodic material.
One thing that I find useful is to listen to the same song as interpreted through the decades, something like El Choclo, which you are bound to find covered by a few dozen orchestras.
If you are interested in exploring this further, I’d be happy to assist you in getting some of these recordings.
cheers, thanks for all your great work
Pablo Asln
Brooklyn, NY
Wow Pablo, thanks so much, this is just the type of information that I needed! I’ve already started looking around the web with these names and just with some preliminary searches; I’ve come up with some good YouTube videos, eMusic downloads, and sites with information. This sort of huge historical study obviously needs much more attention, but it’s a start.
You’ve inspired me to focus on this topic with more posts in 2009 - doing my research in public in a way. It’s such a rich tradition and probably one that I haven’t given enough attention here at LJC.
I’ll definitely be contacting you via e-mail for help with recordings and just some confirmation about facts!
Thanks for contributing, it’s great to have such knowledgeable people adding the facts!
Chip